Continental Gold Inc. (TSX:CNL) (OTCQX:CGOOF)
("Continental" or the "Company") is pleased to announce positive
gold reconciliation results from approximately 600 tonnes of
recently extracted trial mining test ore that the Company
batch-processed through its 30-tonne per day Yaraguá mill located
at the Buriticá project, Antioquia, Colombia. Two
vertically-stacked stopes located along the HW vein in the Yaraguá
system, at a midpoint elevation of 1,525 RL measuring 20 metres
along strike by 35 metres vertically by 2.60 metres wide, were
mined using the mechanized long-hole method. All ore extracted from
the stopes was systematically and thoroughly muck sampled and
assayed, with final results significantly better than the current
mineral resource block model estimate on grade, tonnes and ounces
(see December 18, 2017 Company news release).
Table 1: Estimated Stope Production vs.
Actual Results*
|
Tonnes |
Gold (g/t) |
Silver (g/t) |
Contained Gold Ounces |
ContainedSilver Ounces |
Combined Stope Design |
3,649 |
|
7.34 |
|
14 |
|
862 |
|
1,652 |
|
Actual Results |
4,627 |
|
8.60 |
|
18 |
|
1,285 |
|
2,678 |
|
Increase from Mineral Resource Block Model
Estimation |
+27 |
% |
+17 |
% |
+26 |
% |
+49 |
% |
+62 |
% |
* From December 18, 2017 Company news
release
A total of 594 tonnes of ore, recovered from the
western portion of both the upper and lower stopes, was initially
muck sampled and then batch processed through the Company’s
30-tonne per day Yaraguá mill. The mill results have been
reconciled with both the mineral resource estimate block model and
subsequent muck sampling results. Final results are shown in Table
2.
Table 2: Reconciliation of Batch
Processed Ore from Western Portion of Upper and Lower Trial Mining
Stopes
|
Tonnes |
Gold (g/t) |
Silver (g/t) |
Contained Gold Ounces |
Contained Silver Ounces |
Mineral Resource Block Model(1) |
622 |
|
5.4 |
|
12.3 |
|
109 |
|
246 |
|
Muck Sample Results |
616 |
|
8.4 |
|
16.2 |
|
167 |
|
320 |
|
Actual Results from Processing |
594 |
|
9.1 |
|
13.3 |
|
173 |
|
254 |
|
Difference between Muck Sampling Results and Mineral Resource Block
Model |
-1 |
% |
+56 |
% |
+32 |
% |
+53 |
% |
+30 |
% |
Difference between Actual Results from Processing and
Mineral Resource Block Model |
-5 |
% |
+69 |
% |
+8 |
% |
+59 |
% |
+3 |
% |
(1) Estimated using final stope design.
“Both gold grades and ounces produced continue
to consistently reconcile better than estimates for the Buriticá
project and we are hopeful that it is a harbinger of what to expect
from commercial production once it commences in 2020,” commented
Ari Sussman, CEO. “Project construction continues to make positive
gains and timelines remain on schedule.”
Technical Information
The technical information contained in this
press release has been reviewed and approved by Donald Gray, Chief
Operating Officer of the Company, who is a qualified person within
the meaning of NI 43‑101.
Underground development along the veins was
sampled by trained crews under the direct supervision of mine
geologists. The sampling consisted of channel samples that were
taken by hammer and chisel across the full width of the back every
3 metres along strike. Distinct geological zones were sampled
separately (vein separate from wall rock), with minimum-maximum
horizontal sample widths of 0.1 to 1.0 metres. The widths
of the channels were adjusted so that each sample weighed
approximately 3 kilograms. Sample locations were measured from
a surveyed control point. Channel samples were also taken from
advancing faces in the SG9521W sublevel along the Hanging Wall vein
for comparison with back and drill hole sampling. Duplicate channel
samples were collected with a frequency of one every 25 samples.
Bar code tags were inserted into the individual sample bags by the
geologist, including duplicates which were numbered in sequence
with the primary samples. The bags were then secured with a cable
tie and transported out of the mine by the sampling crew to a
secure staging area on surface. Sample shipments were prepared by
the sampling crew and approved by the Mine Geologist and Chief
Geologist. All channel samples were transported from the gated mine
compound in Company vehicles to a sample preparation lab operated
by ALS Colombia Limited (“ALS”) in Medellín, Colombia. Samples were
then shipped for analysis to ALS Peru’s ISO 9001 accredited assay
laboratory in Lima, Peru.
Muck samples, equivalent to 16 tonnes of broken
material, were taken during stope extraction at a frequency of one
sample from every four scoop buckets. Sampling was performed by the
geology assistant, extracting four separate channels vertically
across the face of the scoop bucket into large pails for the
purpose of approximating as close as possible a representative
sample of both coarse and fine rock fragments present in the muck.
Each sample weighed approximately 40 kilograms. The large
sample was reduced by cone-and-quartering on a canvas to two
5‑kilogram sample splits, which were placed in separate sample
bags. One of these was the primary split and the second was a
quality control duplicate. Sample bags were numbered in sequence
with a numbered tag inserted by the Mine Geologist, who then
secured the individual bags with cable ties. The sampling assistant
and geologists transported the bags out of the mine to a secure
staging area where sample shipments were prepared. In all, 342
primary muck samples were collected, totaling 1.7 tonnes of stope
material. Sampling was done by the same three teams over the entire
program for consistency. The Mine Geologists performed regular
audits of the sampling and sample reduction technique. Custody of
the samples was transferred at the mine site to Actlabs, which
transported the samples to Actlabs Colombia SAS, Medellín,
Colombia, an ISO-9001 accredited facility. Channel samples taken
from the development backs were analyzed by a 50-gram gold fire
assay with atomic absorption finish, or a gravimetric finish for
samples initially reporting over 100 g/t gold. Muck samples were
analyzed by a 50-gram gold fire assay with a gravimetric finish.
All silver values were determined by aqua regia digestion and
atomic absorption method.
Besides rigorous chain-of-custody procedures,
the Company utilized a comprehensive quality control/quality
assurance program for the channel and muck samples, including
routine insertion of blind certified commercial standards, blanks,
field duplicates, check assays and analysis of results using
industry-accepted best practices. For the test stope program, all
quality control anomalies were addressed and/or corrected as
necessary to assure reliable assay results; no material quality
control issues were encountered in the course of the program.
For the core drilling in the test stope area,
the Company applied its standard protocols for sampling and assay.
HQ and NQ core are sawn or split with one-half shipped to a sample
preparation lab in Medellín operated by ALS in Colombia, whereas BQ
core samples are full core. Samples are then shipped for analysis
to ALS Peru’s ISO 9001 accredited assay laboratory in Lima, Peru.
The remainder of the core is stored in a secured storage facility
for future assay verification. Blanks, duplicates and purchased
certified reference standards are inserted into the sample stream
to monitor laboratory performance. A portion of the samples are
periodically check-assayed at SGS Colombia S.A., an ISO 9001
accredited assay laboratory in Medellín, Colombia.
For information on the Buriticá project, please
refer to the technical report, prepared in accordance with
NI 43‑101, entitled “Buriticá Project NI 43–101 Technical
Report Feasibility Study, Antioquia, Colombia” and dated March 29,
2016 with an effective date of February 24, 2016, led by
independent consultants JDS Energy & Mining Inc. The technical
report is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, on the OTCQX at
www.otcmarkets.com and on the Company website at
www.continentalgold.com.
About Continental Gold
Continental Gold Inc. is an advanced-stage
exploration and development company with an extensive portfolio of
100%-owned gold projects in Colombia. Formed in April 2007, the
Company – led by an international management team with a successful
track record of discovering and developing large high-grade gold
deposits in Latin America – is focused on advancing its
fully-permitted high-grade Buriticá gold project to production with
first gold pour on track for early 2020. Additional details on
Continental Gold’s suite of gold exploration properties are also
available at www.continentalgold.com.
For further information, please
contact:
Paul BeginChief Financial OfficerContinental
Gold Inc.+1.416.583.5610info@continentalgold.com
www.continentalgold.com
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains or refers to
forward-looking information under Canadian securities legislation,
including statements regarding the regarding the results of the
feasibility study, including, but not limited to, metal or mineral
recoveries, the Company’s potential plans and operating
performance; the estimation of the tonnage, grades and content of
deposits, and the extent of the resource and reserves estimates;
potential production from and viability of the Company’s
properties; exploration results, potential improvement of mining
dilution grades, future drill programs and studies, future channel
sampling results, exploration and mine development plans, timing of
commercial production and future plans and objectives of the
Company and is based on current expectations that involve a number
of significant business risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking
statements are subject to other factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from expected results. Readers should
not Forward-looking statements are subject to other factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from expected
results. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from any forward-looking statement include, but are not
limited to, an inability to advance the Buriticá project to the
next level, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to
reserves, capital and operating costs varying significantly from
estimates, the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results,
delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental,
environmental or other project approvals, political risks,
uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing
needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes
in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the
development of projects and the other risks involved in the mineral
exploration and development industry. Specific reference is made to
the most recent Annual Information Form on file with Canadian
provincial securities regulatory authorities for a discussion of
some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements. All the
forward-looking statements made in this news release are qualified
by these cautionary statements, and are made as of the date hereof.
The Company assumes no responsibility to update them or revise them
to reflect new events or circumstances other than as required by
law.
Differences in Reporting of Resource
Estimates
This press release was prepared in accordance
with Canadian standards, which differ in some respects from United
States standards. In particular, and without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the terms “inferred mineral
resources,” “indicated mineral resources,” “measured mineral
resources” and “mineral resources” used or referenced in this press
release are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with
National Instrument 43‑101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects under the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of
Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) Standards on Mineral
Resources and Mineral Reserves (the “CIM Standards”). The CIM
Standards differ significantly from standards in the United States.
While the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resources,”
“indicated mineral resources,” and “inferred mineral resources” are
recognized and required by Canadian regulations, they are not
defined terms under standards in the United States. “Inferred
mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their
existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal
feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an
inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher
category. Under Canadian securities laws, estimates of inferred
mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other
economic studies. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or
any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be
converted into reserves. Readers are also cautioned not to assume
that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is
economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces”
in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations;
however, United States companies are only permitted to report
mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by standards in
the United States as in place tonnage and grade without reference
to unit measures. Accordingly, information regarding resources
contained or referenced in this press release containing
descriptions of our mineral deposits may not be comparable to
similar information made public by United States companies.
Collective Mining (TSX:CNL)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 10월(10) 2024 으로 11월(11) 2024
Collective Mining (TSX:CNL)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 11월(11) 2023 으로 11월(11) 2024